-By Larry Sand
The California Teachers Association canâ€™t realistically unionize all charter schools, so it promotes laws that limit their numbers.
In Golden Missed Opportunity, recently published in City Journal, I examined the options that families in California have if they want to remove their children from failing public schools. The pickings in the Golden State are rather slim, and those options we do have — charter schools, homeschooling and the Parent Trigger — are constantly imperiled by a governor and state legislators who typically do the bidding of the California Teachers Association, the largest state affiliate of the National Education Association.
Charter schools are public schools which arenâ€™t bound by the bloated union contracts that stifle so many traditional public schools. California has over 900 charter schools that currently educate about 400,000 students. To the unionâ€™s consternation, only about 15 percent of these schools are unionized. Of course, the union would like to see a 100 percent rate, but accomplishing that would take too much effort and money. Additionally, the flexibility that non-unionization offers is one of the attractions of charter schools for many teachers.
So instead of unionizing, CTA tries to eviscerate current charter laws or get caps on the allowable number of charters. At this time, there are three pieces of CTA sponsored legislation working their way around Sacramento. In fact, just last week the state assembly voted 45-28 to approve one of them, AB 1172. The bill, now in the Senate Rules Committee, was authored by State Assemblyman and former teacher and union activist Tony Mendoza. If AB 1172 becomes law, it would allow a school board to block the creation of a new charter school if it would have a â€œnegative fiscal impactâ€ on the school district. However, â€œnegative fiscal impactâ€ is never really defined, and California charter law already has clearly defined reasons why new petitions can be denied.
Also worth noting is that charter schools get less funding than traditional public schools. According to the non-partisan California Legislative Analyst Office, in 2010-11, new charters got $721 less per pupil than traditional public schools.
In a press release, President of the California Charter School Association Jed Wallace, referring to AB 1172, said that,
â€œThis bill is an attack on charter school students who choose to attend charter schools. California has been a leader in the charter movement, and has the highest number of charter schools and charter school students in the nation. Those numbers rise every year due to parent and student demand for better public education choices. We cannot condone any measure that would deny parents and students the right to choose the best public school.”
And of course, Wallace is right. At this time, charters make up about 10 percent of all public schools in California. Keeping the percentage that low would severely limit the options that parents have in deciding where to send their children to school. This agenda-driven legislation reflects nothing more than the teachers union flexing its muscle in an attempt to keep its political power from eroding. And if children and families are hurt in the process, so be it.
One last note: To give you an idea of the political weight of CTA, the union was the biggest spender on candidates and causes in California in the years 2000-2009, when they spent over $211 million. Additionally, Common Cause has just released the 2011 Campaign Finance and Lobbying Report and CTA was number one here also, spending $6.57 million. Given these numbers, itâ€™s hardly surprising that CTA is easily the biggest power broker in the state.
Larry Sand began his teaching career in New York in 1971. Since 1984, he has taught elementary school as well as English, math, history and ESL in the Los Angeles Unified School District, where he also served as a Title 1 Coordinator. Retired in 2009, he is the president of the non-profit California Teachers Empowerment Network â€“ a non-partisan, non-political group dedicated to providing teachers with reliable and balanced information about professional affiliations and positions on educational issues â€“ information teachers will often not get from their school districts or unions.
“CTEN” was formed in 2006 because a wide range of information from the more global concerns of education policy, education leadership, and education reform, to information having a more personal application, such as professional liability insurance, options of relationships to teachersâ€™ unions, and the effect of unionism on teacher pay, comes to teachers from entities that have a specific agenda. Sandâ€™s comments and op-eds have appeared in City Journal, Associated Press, Newsweek, Townhall Magazine, Los Angeles Times, San Diego Union Tribune, Los Angeles Daily News, San Jose Mercury News, Orange County Register and other publications. This past May, after his weekly blog proved to be very popular, he began writing a monthly article for City Journal, the Manhattan Instituteâ€™s policy publication. He has appeared on numerous broadcast news programs and talk radio shows in Southern California and nationally.
Sand has participated in panel discussions and events focusing on education reform efforts and the impact of teachersâ€™ unions on public education. In March 2010, Sand participated in a debate hosted by the non-profit Intelligence Squared, an organization that regularly hosts Oxford-style debates, which was nationally broadcast on Bloomberg TV and NPR, as well as covered by Newsweek. Sand and his teammates â€“ Terry Moe of the Hoover Institution and former U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige, opposed the proposition – Donâ€™t Blame Teachers Unions For Our Failing Schools. The pro-union team included Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers. In August 2010, he was on a panel at the Whereâ€™s the Outrage? Conference in San Francisco, where he spoke about how charter school operators can best deal with teachersâ€™ unions. This past January he was on panels in Los Angeles, San Diego and San Mateo in support of National School Choice week. Additionally, CTEN has hosted two informational events this year â€“ one addressing the secret agenda that is prevalent in many schools these days and the other concerning itself with Californiaâ€™s new Parent Trigger law. The latter event was covered by both the English and Spanish language press.
Sand has also worked with other organizations to present accurate information about the relationship between teachers and their unions, most recently assisting in the production of a video for the Center for Union Facts in which a group of teachers speak truthfully about the teachersâ€™ unions. At this time, he is conferring with and being an advisor to education policy experts who are crafting major education reform legislation.
CTEN maintains an active and strong new media presence, reaching out to teachers and those interested in education reform across the USA, and around the world, with its popular Facebook page, whose members include teachers, writers, think tankers, and political activists. Since 2006, CTEN has experienced dramatic growth.
No related posts.