-By Larry Sand
In addition to online learning, Democratâ€™s abandonment of their traditional union allies could put an end to the educational status quo and decimate the teachers unions
In my October 18th post, I wrote about Terry Moeâ€™s book Special Interest: Teachers Unions and Americaâ€™s Public Schools. I specifically addressed that part of the book in which he builds a scenario for the eventual undoing of the teachers unions. One of the two ways he claims this will happen is via technology, in the form of online learning. The other route to marginalization is the realization by Democrats that education is really a civil rights issue and that they are morally bound to get on board with reform and choice. By adopting this position, they will be abandoning their longtime political allies â€“ the teachers unions.
As with the rapid ascent of online learning, Moeâ€™s second nail in the unionsâ€™ coffin is picking up speed. In a recent Huffington Post entry, Joy Resmovits addresses the â€œnew education lobby.â€
â€œIt’s ambitious, expansive and, in some cases, modeling itself after sprawling single-issue lobbying organizations like the National Rifle Association and AARP. The groups, which have in large part been created by hedge fund managers and lapsed government officials, count political operatives inside state legislatures and even the Democratic National Committee among their ranks. And they’re using the power of their fundraisers’ purses and sophisticated messaging outfits to push their agendas in local and school-board elections across the country.â€
Traditionally, education reform and school choice have been conservative/libertarian causes. Starting with vouchers, a creation of libertarian Milton Friedman in the 1950s, the ideas for education reform, with few exceptions, have come from right leaning think tanks like Pacific Research Institute, Hoover Institution, Goldwater Institute, Reason Foundation, Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, etc. The policy ideas put forth by these and other similar organizations have formed the basis for many of the education reforms that are in place today.
What is perhaps most interesting about this â€œnew education lobbyâ€ that Resmovits writes about is that many of them are Democrats. Yes, Democrats are essentially picking up the ideas put forth by the right and taking them to statehouses all over the country. And the teachers unions are definitely not enthralled with this new development.
Democrats for Education Reform, founded in 2007, has become a potent lobbying force in just a few years. They have set up shop in ten states and their reform efforts are essentially indistinguishable from those on the right. Consequently, they have not escaped the wrath of the United Federation of Teachers in New York City. The union claims that DFER
- doesnâ€™t sound like Democrats.
- hates teachers.
- knows nothing about education.
- is made up of hedge fund managers (Whitney Tilson, John Petry, et al) and billionaires (Eli Broad, who funds DFERâ€™s sister organization Education Reform Now.)
- is comprised of narcissists.
(Note to reform-minded Democrats – welcome to the world that those on the right have lived in for many years!)
Another example of the Democrat-as-reformer-lobbyist phenomenon is Michelle Rhee, who is a self-described â€œlifelong, card-carrying, dyed-in-the-wool Democrat.â€ After a short, successful and highly publicized reign as Chancellor of D.C. public schools, she left her position after the American Federation of Teachers donated over $1 million to unseat Rheeâ€™s boss, Mayor Adrian Fenty, in 2010. Shortly after Fentyâ€™s loss, Rhee founded Students First, an advocacy organization whose goal is to raise $1 billion in ten years. The AFTâ€™s response to Ms. Rheeâ€™s efforts was to put up a smear website called RheeFirst.
Whereas DFER is out to reform the Democratic Party, Rhee will work with anyone or any organization that shares her reform vision.
There are many other Democrats working hard for reform and incurring the wrath of the unions. Kevin Chavous, cofounder of DFER and Chairman of the Board of Black Alliance for Educational Options, Davis Guggenheim, director of Waiting For Superman and Ben Austin, who fathered the first Parent Trigger law, are just a few examples of Democratâ€™s joining the education reform movement.
Even with this new bipartisan reform effort, the teachers unions are not about to fold their tents and give up any time soon. Itâ€™s going to be a long bloody war with some battles being won (Wisconsin) and some lost (Ohio.) In fact, just last week, Dropout Nationâ€™s Rishawn Biddle wrote about the recent release of the National Education Associationâ€™s 2010-2011 LM-2 filing, a required Department of Labor annual report. revealing recent political expenditures.
â€œThe numbers are spectacular. The nationâ€™s largest teachersâ€™ union spent $133 million in 2010-2011 on lobbying and contributions to groups whose agendas (in theory) dovetail with its own. This included $255,000 to the Economic Policy Institute, the progressive think tank cofounded by Robert Kuttner and Robert Reich, whose education reports generally take a pro-NEA slantâ€¦.â€
â€œAmong the big recipients of the NEAâ€™s largesse this year were ProgressNowâ€™s affiliates in Michigan and Colorado, each receiving, respectively, $10,000 and $125,000, for education policy advocacy and legislative advocacy activities. ProgressNow, by the way, was one of the key players in ousting school reform-minded Michigan legislator Paul Scott from his statehouse seat earlier this month and has decried Gov. Rick Snyderâ€™s efforts to allow for the expansion of charter schools and school choiceâ€¦.â€
â€œThe usual suspects are also on the list: Communities for Quality Education, which has long been subsidized by the NEA, collected $1 million in 2010-2011. Anti-testing group FairTest picked up $35,000 this time around. So are some leading education traditionalists: Parents Across America co-founder) Leonie Haimsonâ€™s Class Size Matters picked up $25,000 from the union last fiscal year, while Western Michiganâ€™s Gary Miron (whose rather flawed study on KIPPâ€™s charter schools earlier this year was the subject of Dropout Nationâ€˜s analysis) picked up $5,000. Meanwhile the NEA directly poured $43,000 into the Save Our Schools rally held this past July; this doesnâ€™t include dollars poured in by state and local affiliates.â€
With the ability to throw this kind of money around, NEAâ€™s effect on maintaining the status quo with its attendant failing educational policies cannot be exaggerated. So those of us involved in reform will have to be satisfied as long as the ball is being advanced, even if itâ€™s slower than we would like. As writer Louis Lâ€™Amour once said, â€œVictory is won not in miles but in inches. Win a little now, hold your ground, and later, win a little more.â€
Larry Sand began his teaching career in New York in 1971. Since 1984, he has taught elementary school as well as English, math, history and ESL in the Los Angeles Unified School District, where he also served as a Title 1 Coordinator. Retired in 2009, he is the president of the non-profit California Teachers Empowerment Network â€“ a non-partisan, non-political group dedicated to providing teachers with reliable and balanced information about professional affiliations and positions on educational issues â€“ information teachers will often not get from their school districts or unions.
“CTEN” was formed in 2006 because a wide range of information from the more global concerns of education policy, education leadership, and education reform, to information having a more personal application, such as professional liability insurance, options of relationships to teachersâ€™ unions, and the effect of unionism on teacher pay, comes to teachers from entities that have a specific agenda. Sandâ€™s comments and op-eds have appeared in City Journal, Associated Press, Newsweek, Townhall Magazine, Los Angeles Times, San Diego Union Tribune, Los Angeles Daily News, San Jose Mercury News, Orange County Register and other publications. This past May, after his weekly blog proved to be very popular, he began writing a monthly article for City Journal, the Manhattan Instituteâ€™s policy publication. He has appeared on numerous broadcast news programs and talk radio shows in Southern California and nationally.
Sand has participated in panel discussions and events focusing on education reform efforts and the impact of teachersâ€™ unions on public education. In March 2010, Sand participated in a debate hosted by the non-profit Intelligence Squared, an organization that regularly hosts Oxford-style debates, which was nationally broadcast on Bloomberg TV and NPR, as well as covered by Newsweek. Sand and his teammates â€“ Terry Moe of the Hoover Institution and former U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige, opposed the proposition – Donâ€™t Blame Teachers Unions For Our Failing Schools. The pro-union team included Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers. In August 2010, he was on a panel at the Whereâ€™s the Outrage? Conference in San Francisco, where he spoke about how charter school operators can best deal with teachersâ€™ unions. This past January he was on panels in Los Angeles, San Diego and San Mateo in support of National School Choice week. Additionally, CTEN has hosted two informational events this year â€“ one addressing the secret agenda that is prevalent in many schools these days and the other concerning itself with Californiaâ€™s new Parent Trigger law. The latter event was covered by both the English and Spanish language press.
Sand has also worked with other organizations to present accurate information about the relationship between teachers and their unions, most recently assisting in the production of a video for the Center for Union Facts in which a group of teachers speak truthfully about the teachersâ€™ unions. At this time, he is conferring with and being an advisor to education policy experts who are crafting major education reform legislation.
CTEN maintains an active and strong new media presence, reaching out to teachers and those interested in education reform across the USA, and around the world, with its popular Facebook page, whose members include teachers, writers, think tankers, and political activists. Since 2006, CTEN has experienced dramatic growth.
No related posts.