Bloomberg News is reporting that Charles Munger, Jr., son of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.’s Charles Munger, has thrown his fortune behind an effort to defeat a campaign funded by unions and the anti-American billionaire George Soros to put redistricting powers back into the hands of politicians bought and paid for by union money.

Munger and his wife have spent some $10.5 million on a plan to continue the creation of a commission composed of five Democrats, five Republicans, and four non-partisan members who are to have the power to affect the redistricting required by Congress as a result of Census statistics.

“I’m doing this to try to ensure voters have fair districts where representatives will compete for offices,” Munger said yesterday in a telephone interview from Palo Alto. “Elected politicians are picking the voters, voters aren’t picking their representatives.”

For their part, Democrats, unions and George Soros are sponsoring Proposition 27, a plan to abolish the independent commission and return the redistricting duties to politicians.

Now, at some level I am torn over the whole episode. In ideal situations I’d hate to have some unelected, unaccountable commission determining how my district is arranged and I’d rather want my elected official to be the one to determine the way it should go. After all, as a voter I have the power to affect my local representative but I’d have no way at all to affect this commission.

However, because unions and anti-American outsiders like Soros have bought and paid for 90% of California’s political class, I can see why people don’t trust their elected officials to do something as important as redistricting.

As we have seen with the entire Obama administration, our elected officials don’t care a whit about what the voters think about anything any more. All they care about is the forty pieces of silver that folks like Soros and his union buddies can fill their pockets with.

In saner days I’d support a Prop 27 that would eliminate this unelected commission. But we are no longer in a time where our democracy is working for the voters. California’s is a government of the unions, by the unions, and for the unions. California’s government is bought and sold to unions, anti-Americans like Soros and the self-flagellating Hollywood crowd.

At this point, I’d argue to keep the commission and keep the dirty hands of the elected crooks out of the process.

But I long for saner days where such commissions were unnecessary devices.

In this era of severe budget cuts, layoffs, and job loss, people in the real world are making due with less. Businesses are cutting back and people are hurting everywhere in this era of Obama. Local governments are also starting to find this economic climate challenging. But even as local budgets are taking hits, unions seem to think it’s still the same flush economy they’ve been taking advantage of for decades.

In the case of two school libraries in Massachusetts teachers unions are so arrogant and greedy that they would rather see the facilities shut down and books left unavailable to kids than see schools keep libraries open with volunteers manning them.

Teachers unions in Bridgewater and Raynham have filed a grievance that might prevent volunteers from working in the libraries. The volunteer workers were to serve as a stop gap effort by the schools to keep the libraries open and serving kids.

Catch this idiotic excuse that union thug, Anita Newman, babbled to explain why the union is trying to close libraries:

“You’re putting unqualified people into the library who are not certified,’’ Newman said, calling it the basis of the grievance. “We don’t want to ruffle feathers, but you’re responsible for the children. We don’t use volunteers for recess or lunch either.’’

Really? How much “training” and “certification” do librarians need to be “responsible for the children”? They are just librarians! One would think that all the school need do is run a background check and then show them the Dewey Decimal system and everything is set! How much expertise do you need to put books on shelves and check out kid’s selections? It ain’t rocket science.

The districts have been using volunteers in its libraries for some time and the reason they are relying on volunteers is to save the district money.

Susan Prewandowski, a regional school committee member and longtime school volunteer, thinks the union thugs are all washed up. “We felt the most important thing was to let the kids have access to the library,’’ she said.

But here is the thing, it’s all about money, money for union thugs. You see, if a union thug can’t be the one putting a book on a shelf then union thugs don’t want anyone doing it. Yes, these union thugs will even shut down libraries and prevent kids from being educated unless they get their cut.

It all goes to show that teachers unions do not care at all about kids. They don’t care about education, either. They only care about their cut of YOUR tax money.