The Democrats are trying to paint the GOP as “obstructionists” for blocking the appointment of Obama’s choice of Erroll Southers to head up the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Democrats are claiming that by blocking the closure of debate on Southers the GOP is trying to obstruct “tighter security at airports.”
But there is an ulterior motive in play for the Democrats, naturally. And, again naturally, it is an effort by Democrats to hand a victory to unions. One of the things that Senator Jim DeMint (R, SC) is trying to stave off is the unionization of our airport security personnel as the Democrats are trying to slide this by the American people in the guise of “security.”
DeMint brought this up in an appearance on CNN on Dec. 29. When asked why he is putting up a protest about Souther DeMint noted that Obama waited 8 months to appoint someone to fill this spot then wanted the appointment to sail through with no debate.
But DeMint also warned about the stealth unionization that Obama is trying to slide past the American people.
Transcript of the relevant section:
CNN: Is there anything that you are going to do to counter this motion he’s going to file to cut off debate?
Jim DeMint: I think that the American people should be aware that the priority of the Administration is to submit our airport security to collective bargaining even though that’s been prohibited since the agency was formed. The reason it’s prohibited is the same reason for the CIA, the Secret Service, the FBI, the Coast Guard… is there’s a constant need to adjust and to be flexible to sue imagination to change things. We cannot ask a third party union boss whether or not we can move a screener from one station to another. That’s what collective bargaining does.
DeMint is arguing that unionism would hamper the ability of the federal government to quickly and efficiently react to the forever changing landscape of airport security. DeMint is 100% right. If the government has to go through layer after layer of union rules, find itself encountering union obstruction, and the threat of union actions against it every time it finds it necessary to deal with the changing security situation in order to stop terrorism, we will all find ourselves with an even more dangerous travel situation than we now have. As DeMint notes, that is why collective bargaining has been prohibited in the first place.
But, in keeping with Obama’s desire to give freebies to unions and his disinterest in our national security, he’s trying to push the TSA to be opened up for unionization. Once again with this Administration the needs of unions takes precedence over the safety and success of the American people.
-By Chuck Muth
“In 2020, this town will be more unionized,” predicts D. Taylor, secretary-treasurer of the Culinary Union in Las Vegas. “The question of going union has been enhanced by the recession.”
Yeah, right. That’s like saying your marriage has been enhanced by having an affair with the wife of your best friend. I mean, who would ever buy that one?
No, what this recession is actually enhancing is the fact that unions don’t create or provide jobs; unions merely exploit the jobs created and provided by others.
Consider a recent Las Vegas Sun story which noted that “members of the Culinary Union, the state’s largest and most powerful union, were registering for food baskets” this past holiday season. Why? Because no matter how large and powerful the union appears to be, it doesn’t create jobs. Businesses create jobs. Unions create food baskets.
And while unions don’t create jobs, they do kill them.
The allure of organized labor is the delusional promise of job security combined with above-market wages and benefits. But you can only keep piling on for so long until the bottom falls out. Just ask all those former high-paid union employees at America’s steel mills and auto factories.
Like leeches, unions feed off the jobs that others create. And once they bleed the host dry, the leeches die as well.
This is the reality that union bosses such as D. Taylor never seem to grasp. Indeed, union agitators would rather a business go out of business – killing off the jobs created by that business in the process – than allow the business to operate without the union getting its “taste.”
Witness, for example, the opening of Glazier’s grocery store in southwest Las Vegas last fall.
Glazier’s is an independently owned and operated facility that created hundreds of new jobs. The store’s owner, Bill Glazier, got his “first job was as a bagger and cart boy at a grocery store in Long Island, New York,” notes Southwest View. “He eventually worked himself up to owning four stores in the Philadelphia area, which he sold in 2000 to retire.”
But the 64-year-old job-creator said he and his wife, Helen, who co-manages the store, “quickly found out that retirement is overrated.” So they rolled the dice and opened a new store in Las Vegas in a highly competitive market and in the middle of the worst recession in modern memory.
That takes….well, you know.
In any event, the store opened with union pickets walking around in circles babbling mindless chants on the sidewalk in front of the store. Why? Because the grateful workers inside opted for good-paying jobs without union representation, that’s why.
What Nevada needs to pull itself out of this jobless recession – enhanced by Sen. Harry Reid’s multi-billion dollar “stimulus” program which stimulated nothing more than higher unemployment – is more risk-takers like Bill Glazier and fewer sponges like D. Taylor. We should be encouraging, not protesting, the job-creating, revenue-producing Bill and Helen Glaziers of our community.
And that includes getting the government to get off their backs.
The fact is you cannot tax and regulate businesses into job-creating profitability. High taxes and ridiculous regulations kill the entrepreneurial spirit, which kills business creation and expansion, which kills jobs. And yet, what did the 2009 Nevada Legislature do?
It doubled the license tax imposed on people like Bill Glazier who dare to open a new business, and expanded that tax to penalize people like Bill Glazier who dare to open up additional locations. Then, adding insult to injury, it doubled the employee head-tax penalty on people like Bill Glazier for hiring people.
To borrow a phrase, “totally psychotic.”
You wanna create jobs and pull Nevada out of this recession in no time flat? Simple: Tell the government and union bosses such as D. Taylor to get the hell out of the way and let men like Bill Glazier do what men like Bill Glazier do. This isn’t exactly rocket science, kids.
The Weekly Standard focused on ACORN’s latest knight in shining armor in the Senate. Though, instead of holding a sword or a lance, this Senator is holding a bucket of the taxpayer’s money to give to ACORN.
Roland Burris, the Junior Senator from Illinois whose seat was bestowed upon him under a cloud of corruption by disgraced Governor Rod Balgojevich, had been saying that he wouldn’t vote for the Senate’s version of Obamacare. But when the time came he happily voted in favor of the bill saying that some of his concerns were met.
The Weekly Standard notes that one of Burris’ “concerns” was in a provision of the manager’s amendment to the bill that includes funding for, “making sure that diabetes and the other diseases that are affecting minorities are really studied by HHS…”
But these provisions, the WS notes, could lead to funding for ACORN.
According to a Senate legislative aide, the scandal-plagued Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now could qualify for grants under this provision. ACORN would also qualify for funding on page 150 of the underlying Reid bill, which says that “community and consumer-focused nonprofit groups” may receive grants to “conduct public education activities to raise awareness of the availability of qualified health plans.”
So, as always, criminal leftists never leave the feeding trough in Washington. They might find the spotlight a bit uncomfortable when Americans find out about their activities. But they simply hunker down and wait for their accomplices in Congress to re-open the funding spigot once the heat is off.
And these profligate spenders in Congress are only too happy to comply.

Merry Christmas, 2009
“And unto you a child is born.” With that promise we lowly humans were given the promise of a light unto all men, a light that will lead us to our salvation if only we choose to accept that path.
As 2009 ends and we prepare to welcome in 2010 it would behoove us all to reflect on that promise. In fact, even if you are not a religious sort, even if you believe in another religion or none, the path that Christ was born into this world to reveal to us all is one worthy of study and acceptance. Christ’s path is, indeed, a philosophy worthy of consideration for it is one based on service to your fellows, love for all, and a suppression of one’s selfishness in order to pursue a higher calling.
What could be a better path, even for the non-religious amongst us?
So, as we celebrate the day to memorialize the birth of Christ this Christmas Day and as we head into 2010 let us all strive to work harder to be of service to our fellows. Let us engage in those random acts of kindness that makes everyone’s lives so much more fulfilling. Let us remember to say thanks to those who have done something for us and let us offer our own efforts to others without expecting immediate repayment.
Let’s try and leave this place a bit better off than when we came in.
We want to thank each and every one of you for having been such wonderfully loyal readers and for you folks that have only been a recent visitor, may you find a home here for the upcoming days. We hope to give you a Christmas gift that never stops giving here at TheUnionLabelBlog.
May God Bless you all and enjoy the day with your family and friends.
Merry Christmas and may you have a Happy New Year
Yours,
Warner Todd Huston
We mentioned last month that unions, many of which belong to Big Education, were some of the biggest contributors of cash to politicians, but Kyle Olson of BigGovernment.com breaks it down even further…
We know how liberals, particularly those in the education establishment, like to say that Corporate America dictates public policy through campaign contributions.
A new report, prepared by the Center for Responsive Politics and the National Institute on Money in State Politics, does a good job of dispelling that myth.
As it turns out, the National Education Association was by far the nation’s biggest political contributor during the 2008 election cycle. The NEA dropped a cool $56.3 million on its list of favored liberal candidates at various levels of government, which was about $12 million more than the runner-up contributor spent.
The American Federation of Teachers was also busy writing contribution checks, to the tune of $13.8 million. And the two unions joined forces to contribute about $3.3 million to various campaigns in a handful of states…
Read the rest at BigGovernment.com.





