<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Agrees to PROTECT Union Corruption, not Eliminate it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theunionlabelblog.com/2008/05/05/obama-agrees-to-protect-union-corruption-not-eliminate-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theunionlabelblog.com/2008/05/05/obama-agrees-to-protect-union-corruption-not-eliminate-it/</link>
	<description>Exposing union corruption one post at a time</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: WTH</title>
		<link>http://theunionlabelblog.com/2008/05/05/obama-agrees-to-protect-union-corruption-not-eliminate-it/#comment-22388</link>
		<dc:creator>WTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunionlabelblog.com/?p=232#comment-22388</guid>
		<description>What's even MORE amazing is that you ignore the mob infested unions that are universally corrupt to claim that oversight isn't needed! Now THAT'S amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s even MORE amazing is that you ignore the mob infested unions that are universally corrupt to claim that oversight isn&#8217;t needed! Now THAT&#8217;S amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://theunionlabelblog.com/2008/05/05/obama-agrees-to-protect-union-corruption-not-eliminate-it/#comment-22356</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunionlabelblog.com/?p=232#comment-22356</guid>
		<description>I think it's amazing how much you've read into this. And I think we should note that getting rid of oversight where it's not needed is a way to eliminate bureaucracy, not a way to "protect corruption."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s amazing how much you&#8217;ve read into this. And I think we should note that getting rid of oversight where it&#8217;s not needed is a way to eliminate bureaucracy, not a way to &#8220;protect corruption.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
