Comments on: Electrical Workers Union Chief Embezzles Dues http://theunionlabelblog.com/2008/05/03/electrical-workers-union-chief-embezzles-dues/ Exposing union corruption one post at a time Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:47:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Eric Odom http://theunionlabelblog.com/2008/05/03/electrical-workers-union-chief-embezzles-dues/#comment-22338 Eric Odom Tue, 06 May 2008 14:40:08 +0000 http://theunionlabelblog.com/?p=231#comment-22338 Funny watching the Union thugs and cheerleaders squirm over this story. Even here in the comments the cheerleaders do their best to discredit the obvious. Lovely, isn't it? Funny watching the Union thugs and cheerleaders squirm over this story. Even here in the comments the cheerleaders do their best to discredit the obvious.

Lovely, isn’t it?

]]> By: WTH http://theunionlabelblog.com/2008/05/03/electrical-workers-union-chief-embezzles-dues/#comment-22292 WTH Tue, 06 May 2008 03:03:31 +0000 http://theunionlabelblog.com/?p=231#comment-22292 Actually, I didn't say WHO got WHAT. For that matter, I couldn't care less. These guys are both crooks no matter who got what. Actually, I didn’t say WHO got WHAT. For that matter, I couldn’t care less. These guys are both crooks no matter who got what.

]]> By: Netvironmentalist http://theunionlabelblog.com/2008/05/03/electrical-workers-union-chief-embezzles-dues/#comment-22276 Netvironmentalist Tue, 06 May 2008 00:41:12 +0000 http://theunionlabelblog.com/?p=231#comment-22276 John Dougherty is the union "chief" you mentioned in the title; Donald "Gus" Dougherty is the contractor under indictment with whom you confused the former. You are also confused about who got the $40,000 sound system. But since you obviously have no journalistic integrity to begin with, I'm sure you won't take the time to understand the story and correct yourself. In fact, I'll bet you're incapable of admitting you're wrong. John Dougherty is the union “chief” you mentioned in the title; Donald “Gus” Dougherty is the contractor under indictment with whom you confused the former. You are also confused about who got the $40,000 sound system. But since you obviously have no journalistic integrity to begin with, I’m sure you won’t take the time to understand the story and correct yourself. In fact, I’ll bet you’re incapable of admitting you’re wrong.

]]> By: WTH http://theunionlabelblog.com/2008/05/03/electrical-workers-union-chief-embezzles-dues/#comment-22252 WTH Mon, 05 May 2008 18:33:14 +0000 http://theunionlabelblog.com/?p=231#comment-22252 Jim, Sorry but your post is meaningless. I made no mention of EITHER Dougherty in my own comments so how am I "confusing" them? The article I linked to speaks for itself. All the info about the Dougherty's is there. Jim,

Sorry but your post is meaningless. I made no mention of EITHER Dougherty in my own comments so how am I “confusing” them? The article I linked to speaks for itself. All the info about the Dougherty’s is there.

]]> By: WTH http://theunionlabelblog.com/2008/05/03/electrical-workers-union-chief-embezzles-dues/#comment-22251 WTH Mon, 05 May 2008 18:31:28 +0000 http://theunionlabelblog.com/?p=231#comment-22251 In other words, all you have is rhetoric because if you had a REAL point to make you would have made it. Thanks for stopping by. In other words, all you have is rhetoric because if you had a REAL point to make you would have made it. Thanks for stopping by.

]]> By: Netvironmentalist http://theunionlabelblog.com/2008/05/03/electrical-workers-union-chief-embezzles-dues/#comment-22242 Netvironmentalist Mon, 05 May 2008 16:32:10 +0000 http://theunionlabelblog.com/?p=231#comment-22242 How embarrassing for you. You authored a post on an article you obviously did not read, or were unable to comprehend, while touting your commentary as thoughtful, sometimes irreverent and often historically based. Perhaps your omission of factual from that list wasn't an oversight. Although the article on which your erroneously titled blog post, "Electrical Workers Union Chief Embezzles Dues," is based has a Flesch-Kincaid readability score of almost sixteen, a thoughtful commentator such as yourself should have no problem comprehending it. Please, for the sake of what little integrity online commentary actually does have, go back, read the article carefully and amend your blathering. Thank you How embarrassing for you. You authored a post on an article you obviously did not read, or were unable to comprehend, while touting your commentary as thoughtful, sometimes irreverent and often historically based. Perhaps your omission of factual from that list wasn’t an oversight.

Although the article on which your erroneously titled blog post, “Electrical Workers Union Chief Embezzles Dues,” is based has a Flesch-Kincaid readability score of almost sixteen, a thoughtful commentator such as yourself should have no problem comprehending it.

Please, for the sake of what little integrity online commentary actually
does have, go back, read the article carefully and amend your blathering.

Thank you

]]> By: Jim Bradley http://theunionlabelblog.com/2008/05/03/electrical-workers-union-chief-embezzles-dues/#comment-22223 Jim Bradley Mon, 05 May 2008 13:36:33 +0000 http://theunionlabelblog.com/?p=231#comment-22223 You are confusing two different people: John Dougherty and Donald "Gus" Dougherty. Reread the quoted portiion in your own post. You are confusing two different people: John Dougherty and Donald “Gus” Dougherty. Reread the quoted portiion in your own post.

]]>