Coalition Calls for Full Funding of Union Watchdog
Posted on September 10, 2007 at 2:42 pm by Chuck Muth
Below is a coalition letter signed by close to 20 groups, including Citizen Outreach Project, urging the Senate to use budget-neutral methods to restore full funding to the Office of Labor Management Standards (OLMS) as requested by the President…
September 10, 2007Dear Senator:
On behalf of the undersigned organizations representing hundreds of thousands of workers, employers, taxpayers, small businesses, shareholders, consumers and senior citizens, we strongly urge you and your colleagues to reverse the increasingly dangerous direction that the 110th Congress is taking in aligning with Big Labor and restore full funding to the Office of Labor Management Standards (OLMS).
Specifically, the House-passed version of H.R. 3043, the 2008 Labor-HHS-Education appropriations bill, cuts OLMS funding by $2 million and falls $11 million short of the Bush administration’s budget request. By cutting funding for the agency that monitors union activity, those in the House are sending a clear message to the American worker that big labor does not need monitoring and can continue to operate unchecked. Despite the OLMS’s obvious success, reducing operating costs for a government agency completely interferes with that agency’s ability to effectively and efficiently do their job.
In an effort to curtail government spending, this coalition is calling for a “budget neutral” solution where frivolous, over-inflated areas of Labor Department spending are cut providing capital that can be used to restore funding to the OLMS. One such solution would be to end federal unemployment subsidies for individuals with incomes over $120,000. The Department of Labor estimates that this will generate a one-year savings of $400 million. This more than covers the President’s proposal of $56.9 million with capital left-over; and this is merely one example of wasteful government spending that could be eliminated or reduced to provide funding for an organization with proven results.
At a time when unions are increasingly desperate to maintain their relevance, OLMS investigations have resulted in 780 convictions and more than $100 million in restitution for union members, why would the Senate pass legislation that would ultimately give “union bosses” a free pass over the control and intimidation of workers nationwide?
On the heels of a legislative season filled with anti-worker freedom legislation, cutting the OLMS budget gives union corruption the seal of approval to resume crime & fiscal improprieties without consequence. If there is any doubt regarding the correlation between OLMS funding and union monitoring, think again; the numbers speak for themselves. Consider that the agency’s budget increased 50 percent from 2001 to 2006 and at that same time convictions increased 26 percent – while union membership was on the decline. With direct, positive correlations between increased funding and a rise in convictions of corrupt union members, there will be no justification Senator if you align with big labor and against workers rights.
Regardless, despite the over 200 percent increase in OLMS compliance audits conducted between 2001 and 2006 and the 780 convictions, the House still sided against the worker and chose to protect big labor. Senator, the members of this collation are urging you and your colleagues not to make the same mistake. Several of these organizations and individuals will continue to monitor your vote and will rank this vote in their annual scorecards. Don’t send the message to your constituents that you side with big labor and against workers rights. Choose a “budget neutral” solution and give OLMS the tools necessary to protect worker freedom by ensuring the fiscal accountability of Big Labor.
We strongly urge you to vote to restore full funding by using “budget neutral” methods, as requested to the Office of Labor Management Standards so that union corruption will not go unchecked and workers can have their safety and their freedom.
Sincerely,
Lori Roman
Executive Director
ALECDavid A. Keene
Chairman
American Conservative UnionBrian M. Johnson
Director of Policy
Alliance for Worker FreedomJeffery Mazzella
President
Center for Individual FreedomRyan Ellis
Executive Director
American Shareholders AssociationChuck Muth
President
Citizen Outreach ProjectTim Phillips
President
Americans for ProsperityRichard O. Rowland
President
Grassroots Institute of HawaiiGrover G. Norquist
President
Americans for Tax ReformDiana Furchtgott-Roth
Director, Center for Employment Policy
Hudson Institute, Washington, D.C.Charles W. Baird
Emeritus Professor of Economics
California State University, East BayKhaled Saffuri
President
Islamic Free Market InstituteKay Daily
President
Coalition for a Fair JudiciaryWilliam Fine
Executive Director
National Alliance for Worker and Employer RightThomas Schatz
President
Council for Citizens Against Government WasteDavid Denholm
President
Public Service Research CouncilDerrick Hunter
Executive Director
Media Freedom ProjectDavid J. Hansen
President
Buckeye Institute for Public Policy SolutionsRichard Faulkner
Executive Vice President
Maryland Taxpayers Association, Inc.







October 31st, 2007 at 2:27 pm
I am a member of SEIU- UHW West and have some serious concerns about our recent lack of repesentation and how our monies are being sent and the information published regarding Union corruption. We would like to know how to contact the Federal Union Watchdog and what our rights our with regards to the Union to its members. Please contact me at (818)307-1590 or myrankids@yahoo.com