THE UNION LABEL

Exposing union corruption one post at a time

Chicago: SEIU’s Kind of Town

Posted on August 14, 2006 at 3:08 pm by Chuck Muth

Across the Midwest, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) is spending buckets of its members’ dues money to build up the union’s political muscle. In Chicago, it looks like they’re trying to resurrect the city’s political machine. With 50 seats and a weak mayoral office, the City Council enjoys considerable power, something SEIU leaders would love to get their hands on. As the Chicago Sun-Times reported on August 3:

The Illinois Council of the Service Employees International Union has held three day-long training workshops for 500 potential candidates and community leaders. SEIU is committed to spending as much as $2 million to elect aldermen to better represent working people. The union is committing its organizers and hopes to engage the 250,000 people it represents in the alderman elections next February.

If averaged out, SEIU is preparing as many as ten candidates per election, with $40,000 to spend on each seat. Nearby in Ohio, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported on August 6 that “[i]n its contribution to statewide Democratic candidates this year, the SEIU has been distributing $10,000 checks like a nurse handing out aspirin.” At the same time, SEIU has been spending money throughout the Buckeye State trying to turn public opinion against hospitals to soften them up for unionization, including $329,000 spent trying to get an initiative passed in just one town:

“We do think we need to be a larger organization,” [Ohio SEIU President Dave Regan] said. “Nobody criticizes Bill Gates at Microsoft when he wants to get a bigger market share.”

The difference, according to Bill Harding, a board member with the Ohio Hospital Association: “Bill Gates grows because he adds value to the marketplace. So far we haven’t seen anything but destructive behavior.”

SOURCE: UnionFacts.com, 8/11/06


2 Responses to “Chicago: SEIU’s Kind of Town”

  1. Neal Rainwater Says:
    August 14th, 2006 at 9:28 pm

    I see very little difference between the unions causing businesses to pay out more in wages than in Jesse Jackson going into Coca-Cola and telling the management that he must have their check for $40 million or his followers will not buy anymore cokes. In both cases it is a shakedown…..and both seem to be legal. ‘Sorta like the Mafia, isn’t it?

  2. Richard Brady Says:
    August 15th, 2006 at 12:36 am

    Unions are now going after the jobs that cannot be sourced overseas. The US auto industry can no longer compete, and if we think health care and government costs are hogh now, what will happen to out taxes when there is a monopoly that provides workers. Politicans, especiall Union favoring Democrats, will cater to unions to get the votes.

Leave a Reply